Mickael Romaniello
30 minutes, no slides, nothing to prepare.
Mickael Romaniello
30 minutes, no slides, nothing to prepare.
12 years of experience. 15+ apps delivered. One single point of contact, from concept to App Store and Google Play publication.
In short: for your Birmingham (1,144,900 residents) project in England, you work directly with me, not a middleman. 12 years of experience, 15+ apps delivered, and a transparent end-to-end process.
Birmingham is a true hub of innovation in England.
Ideas are flying, projects are launching, and the competition is fierce. Whatever your industry, there is a very high chance your direct competitors are already thinking about their own mobile app. Or worse, they have already launched it. 🚀
In such a crowded market, whoever offers the smoothest user experience wins the game.
In short: innovation is no longer an option,
Many project founders in Birmingham waste time hesitating. They push back development month after month. But the market in United Kingdom does not wait.
You want to launch a digital project in Birmingham. You meet with developers, and suddenly they are throwing words at you like frontend, backend, APIs, and databases.
You nod your head, but honestly, you are lost.
Forget the technical jargon. Building a mobile application is exactly like opening a restaurant in England. It is a precise mechanism where every single element plays a vital role.
Let's imagine your app as this famous restaurant.
The frontend is the dining room. It is the decor, the tables, the menu presentation, the ambiance. It is the actual app your users download to their phones. This frontend must be beautiful, welcoming, and follow strict standards, like Apple's Human Interface Guidelines. If the dining room is ugly, the customer will not enter.
Next, there is the API. The API is the waiter. The customer gives them their order. The waiter runs to the kitchen to pass on the information, then comes back with the hot plate of food. Without the waiter, the dining room and the kitchen cannot communicate.
The key point: the price depends on the technical complexity under the hood, not on the number of pages.
No agency. No sales rep. No project manager standing between us.
When you work with me, you talk directly to the person building your app. For 12 years, I have managed the creation of iOS and Android applications from A to Z from my office in Cannes. That means faster responses, less talk, and zero bad surprises on the invoice.
The key point: we save an incredible amount of time. I advise you, I design, and I develop with total transparency. It really is that simple.
The number one fear when starting an app project is losing control: you sign an estimate, hand over your idea, and hear nothing for three months. The way of working described here exists so that does not happen.
Three rules, the same on every project:
You test the app on your own phone every two weeks.
Birmingham work often comes from businesses with a physical operation behind the app — logistics, retail, trades. Those projects live or die on whether the app works with no signal in a warehouse or a van, and that decision has to be made in week one, because it shapes how everything stores data.
The reason it cannot wait is structural. An app that assumes a connection asks the server for what it needs and shows the answer. An app that works offline keeps its own copy of the data, decides what to do when two people change the same record in different places, and syncs in the background without the user thinking about it. Those are not the same app with a feature added; they are different architectures. Retrofitting the second onto the first is usually a rewrite, and I would rather tell you that in the first meeting than in the fourth month.
Businesses with vans and depots also have a second constraint that catches people out: the phone is not a desk. It is used one-handed, sometimes in gloves, sometimes in rain, often by someone who did not choose the app and does not want to be learning software. That pushes hard toward fewer screens, bigger targets, and as little typing as possible — scanning, picking from a list, or tapping a single obvious button. An app that requires careful input on a loading bay gets filled in later at the desk, from memory, which means your data is wrong.
Birmingham is also a genuinely multilingual city, and for a consumer-facing product that is worth a deliberate decision rather than a default. Shipping in English only is a perfectly reasonable choice; discovering after launch that a third of your intended users struggle with the sign-up form is not. Deciding it at the start costs a conversation. Deciding it afterwards costs a redesign, because screens laid out for English rarely hold a longer language without breaking.
An app can be built fast and cheap. What costs money is what comes next: code written without structure becomes impossible to change, and the smallest new feature means starting over. Invent Better charges for the work that makes a second version possible — tests, a readable architecture, and code another developer can pick up.
It is entirely possible to build a mobile application extremely fast and for very little money.
All you have to do is ignore every best practice, copy and paste random blocks of code from the internet, and cross your fingers hoping it holds together. On the day of your big presentation in Birmingham, the app will probably look fine.
But that thin layer of paint will crack almost immediately.
The second you get more than ten users trying to log in at the same time, the system will crawl to a halt. On mobile devices, user patience is brutally short. And slowness is always perceived as a broken product.
You do not need to be in the same office to build an excellent application.
Today, the digital economy in Birmingham operates without borders. But for remote work to be truly effective, you need military-grade organization. Technical chaos is incredibly expensive.
The key advantage of my approach is absolute transparency. Here is how we will collaborate, even if hundreds or thousands of miles separate us.
Let's start with the tools. There are no black boxes with me.
For design, I work code-first with visual mockups validated with you. For projects requiring specialized UX/UI work, I partner with a trusted designer. You can click through them, leave comments directly on specific buttons, and validate the interface before I ever write a single line of code.
For the code itself, I use GitHub. You have full access to the engine room. You are the sole owner of your product from A to Z.
A transparent, iterative process with zero surprises. You see the app grow every single week.
Nothing beats a concrete example to truly understand. Here is the story of an established service company.
This business had a standard website. Their analytics showed that most their traffic was coming from mobile phones. That is a massive number. But there was a major issue. They were getting absolutely zero bookings from those devices.
Their customers were trying to book appointments, getting lost on the clunky mobile site, and giving up entirely.
The technical challenge was very real. We needed to handle a complex calendar system, secure payments, send push notification reminders, and allow multiple users to coordinate schedules.
The client wanted to build everything at once. A loyalty program, a blog, a forum, and the booking module.
I reminded them of a vital statistic: most app features are never actually used. Why spend thousands of dollars on ghost options?
In short: we do not build everything. We build what your users actually need.
If price is your only criterion, we are probably not a good fit, and saying so early saves us both time. A cheap build is rarely cheaper overall: code written without structure becomes impossible to change, so the second version costs more than the first would have. What you are really buying is the ability to keep changing the app after launch.
If price is your one and only criterion for choosing a developer in Birmingham, we are probably not a good fit to work together.
This is not arrogance. It is honesty.
Let's talk about the true value of things in our United Kingdom.
The global e-learning market grows every single year. And for good reason: students and professionals in England want to learn anywhere, at any time.
A solid mobile e-learning platform is not just a messy list of videos. It is the ability to securely download those courses to watch them on the Birmingham subway without burning through a cellular data plan.
You have to add gamification, achievement badges, and streak tracking to maintain high motivation. For schools, we integrate a direct notification system for parents, ensuring that critical information flows completely without friction.
The restaurant industry has radically changed. If your restaurant in Birmingham is not in your regular customers' pockets, you are missing out on massive revenue.
Forget the big delivery platforms that take huge cuts of your margin. The key advantage of having your own application is total control.
One condition and three criteria. The condition is frequency: an app lives on a home screen, and an icon opened once a year never pays for itself. If your customers come back weekly, one criterion out of three is then enough — it uses the phone itself, it has to work with no network, or it has a legitimate reason to bring people back. Otherwise a website does the same job for less, and I will say so.
An app idea cannot be patented as such; what can be protected is the name — a registered trademark — and the code, covered by copyright from the moment it is written. In practice the risk is almost never theft: it is taking six months to ship while someone else takes two. If it worries you, a non-disclosure agreement can be signed before the first call, without difficulty.
No, and starting without one is healthier. Scoping is about what the app does and for whom; the styling comes after, and it comes out better once the screens are known. If you already have an identity, we use it. If not, the first version can be plain and legible — which is not a fallback: plenty of apps would be better off staying that way.
Yes, and it is often the best money in the project. Clickable mockups put in front of ten people reveal in a week what a three-month build would reveal too late. You see where people hesitate, what they cannot find, what they do not care about. It is also what lets you remove features before paying for them rather than after.
Yes, always, and this is the one point I do not bend on. Both accounts are paid and created under your company's name; I work on them with delegated access. An app published under a provider's account is an app you do not control: you can neither update it nor transfer it without them. Apple's side takes a while to set up, so start early.
As late as possible. A sign-up screen on opening is the first cause of abandonment: the person has seen nothing yet and you are already asking for something. The good rule is to let them try, then ask for an account when it becomes useful — to find their data on another device, to pay, to be recognised. Plenty of apps gain users simply by moving that screen.
The simple rule: collect only what you actually use, say so plainly, and let people undo it. In practice that means a readable privacy policy, consent asked at the right moment rather than in one block at launch, and a way to delete an account from inside the app — Apple requires it. The privacy labels on both stores also have to match what the app really does.
Yes, and there is a rule to know before building a business model on it: anything consumed inside the app goes through Apple's or Google's payment system, which takes a commission. Selling a service consumed elsewhere — physical work, a delivered order — is charged normally. The difference is not a detail; it changes the price you need to display.
Nothing. No specification, no deck, no fixed budget. Thirty minutes is enough if you can answer two questions: who is going to use it, and what does it save them. If you have screenshots of apps you like, bring them — showing what you like is faster than describing it. The rest is my job to ask.
Three signals, and I say them on the call rather than in the third month. If nobody on your side can answer my questions during the build, it will not move. If the budget covers the build but nothing of the following year, the app will die quietly. And if the goal is to reassure an investor rather than serve a user, a mockup costs a hundred times less and does the same job.
Ready to launch your app in Birmingham?
You have the idea. You know your market in England. Now, it is time to take action.
But not just in any random way. The key advantage of working together is absolute clarity. I will not sell you useless features. I will not make empty promises that I cannot keep.
In 30 minutes, you will know exactly where to start. No commitment. No technical jargon.
Book a free call →
30 minutes to start your project
Book a free call →Most of my projects run remotely, and in practice that changes very little. We talk over video whenever you need to, not only at major milestones, and you can reach me with questions at any point during the project — I always answer.
Once we are working together, travelling to meet you on site can absolutely be arranged if your project calls for it. Travel costs are quoted separately, upfront and with no surprises.